#Cisco asa 5505 power adapter full

#Cisco asa 5505 power adapter full

So on paper the ASA 5505 has much better throughput and general hardware specifications, yet the SSG 5 supports more VPN tunnels, VLANS and has full UTM (Unified Threat Management). The IMIX traffic used is made up of 58.33% 64 byte packets + 33.33% 570 byte packets + 8.33% 1518 byte packets of UDP traffic. ** IMIX traffic is more demanding than a single packet size performance test and as such is more representative of real-world customer network traffic. The first thing I'll do is compare the two devices 'on paper'. There are many models of the SSG 5 and ASA 5505 available, for this review I will be looking at the non wireless SSG 5 256mb version and the unlimited user ASA 5505 K9 version.Д«efore we get started I should make it clear that I work with the Juniper range of hardware every day so I may be bias. The SSG 5 replaces the old Netscreen 5GT. The SSG 5 is Juniper's lowest end Secure Services Gateway (SSG). The 5505 replaces the old PIX 501 and 506e. The ASA 5505 is part of Cisco's new range of Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) the replacement for the PIX.

I thought it was about time I did proper review of the Cisco ASA 5505 and the Juniper SSG 5.Д«oth devices are at the low end of firewall security devices offered by Cisco and Juniper.

Cisco ASA 5505 vs Juniper SSG 5 Michael Dale